WhiteIndex

Earthquakes in Mexico, 1926–2026

397on the map
54M ≥ 7
8.2max M
Magnitude
1926
2026
Layers
WhiteIndex

Tap a circle or a line on the map to see the details

M 6 · 6.5 · 7 · 7.5 (outlined if M ≥ 7)
M 4.5 · 5.5 (smaller events, no outline)
Subduction zone / thrust belt (teeth on the overriding side)
Strike-slip fault / transform zone
Elevations of 500, 1,000 and 2,000 m and sea depths of 200, 1,000 and 3,000 m: darker means higher or deeper.
Shaking intensity zones from USGS ShakeMap (MMI scale: IV, VI, VIII). Shown when you select an event.
zones (model) — a USGS model reconstruction (ShakeMap Atlas), not measurements
Normal fault (graben boundary), ticks on the downthrown side
Diffuse or poorly mapped zone
Historical events before 1926 (for context)

Fault lines are schematic, drawn from published reviews without precise georeferencing. Construction decisions require Mexico’s current building codes, National Seismological Service (SSN) data and site-specific engineering surveys.

All events of magnitude 4.5 and above in the USGS ComCat catalog within 14–33°N, 86.5–118.5°W, plus the main active faults.

Main faults

Strongest events (M ≥ 7.5), 1926–2026

DateMDepth, kmLocation (USGS)Structure
1928-06-177.992015 km ESE of San Gabriel Mixtepec, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1928-10-097.51256 km WSW of San Miguel Panixtlahuaca, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1931-01-157.6355 km SSW of San Miguel Suchixtepec, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1932-06-038.1351932 Jalisco, Mexico EarthquakeRivera plate subduction (interface rupture)
1932-06-187.8157 km E of Los Tepames, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1932-06-227.72512 km NNE of La Central, MexicoTsunami earthquake, Rivera–Cocos zone
1941-04-157.63021 km ESE of Coalcomán de Vázquez Pallares, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1957-07-287.637.88 km ENE of Apantla, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1973-01-307.54335 km SW of Aguililla, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1976-02-047.557 km N of Los Amates, GuatemalaMotagua Fault (Guatemala)
1978-11-297.7182 km ESE of San Agustín Loxicha, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1979-03-147.64912 km SSE of Vallecitos de Zaragoza, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1985-09-19827.91985 Michoacan, Mexico EarthquakeCocos plate subduction (Michoacán)
1985-09-217.630.87 km N of Pantla, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
1995-10-098331995 Colima-Jalisco, Mexico EarthquakeMiddle America Trench (by location)
1999-09-307.560.615 km W of San Baltazar Loxicha, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
2003-01-227.62416 km SSW of Cuyutlán, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)
2017-09-088.247.42017 Tehuantepec, Mexico EarthquakeNormal faulting within the Cocos plate (Tehuantepec)
2022-09-197.626.935 km SSW of Aguililla, MexicoMiddle America Trench (by location)

Structure attribution is an interpretation based on epicentre location and the literature. Stated directly by sources: 1932 (Jalisco), Rivera plate subduction; 1976, Motagua Fault; 1985, Cocos plate subduction; 2017 (Tehuantepec), normal faulting within the Cocos plate. Click a row to show the event on the map.

USGS data as of 11 October 2026

Country analytical review →

Sources and method

Catalog. USGS ComCat, FDSN event web service: M ≥ 4.5, 1926-01-01 to 2026-10-11, 14–33°N, 86.5–118.5°W. 6,077 events in total: 397 of M ≥ 6, 1,812 of M 5–5.9 and 3,868 of M 4.5–4.9. Downloaded on 2026-10-11 directly from the USGS server and verified with checksums. For events below M 6, coordinates are rounded to 0.01° and magnitude to 0.1; place names were not kept. Any event can be checked in the USGS search.

Mexico’s strongest earthquakes. 1985 Mexico City earthquake; 2017 Puebla earthquake; 2017 Chiapas earthquake; 1932 Jalisco earthquakes; 1957 Guerrero earthquake.

Middle America Trench, Gulf of California, Sierra El Mayor 2010. Middle America Trench; Gulf of California Rift Zone; 2010 Baja California earthquake.

Motagua Fault and Guatemala 1976. Motagua Fault; 1976 Guatemala earthquake.

Historical events. 1912 Acambay earthquake; 1787 Mexico earthquake.

Terrain and depths. AWS Terrain Tiles (Terrarium format, Mapzen; combines SRTM, GMTED2010, ETOPO1 and other datasets), zoom 6 (about 2.4 km). The data are smoothed and generalised to contours of 500, 1,000 and 2,000 m and depths of 200, 1,000 and 3,000 m; areas smaller than about 900 km² are not shown.

Intensity zones and impacts. USGS ShakeMap: 1976 (usp0000ex3, Atlas v4), 1985 (usp0002jwe, Atlas v4), 2017, M 8.2 (us2000ahv0, Atlas v4), 2017, M 7.1 (us2000ar20, Atlas v4); MMI IV, VI and VIII contours simplified to about 1 km. These are ShakeMap Atlas model estimates based on the data available at the time. Losses: 1985 Mexico City earthquake; 2017 Puebla earthquake; 2017 Chiapas earthquake; 1976 Guatemala earthquake.

Coastlines. Natural Earth 1:10m (world-atlas 2.0.2 package); lakes are not shown separately.

Sources for the text

How earthquakes affect property prices

Seismic risk is one of the few factors that lowers property values for a long time and in a measurable way. This is not a forecast but a finding from markets where the risk has been officially mapped and prices can be tracked for years.

  • New Zealand. After the 2010–2011 earthquakes, land in Christchurch was classified by liquefaction risk. By the third year, homes in the highest-risk category had lost 17.7% of their value relative to neighbouring land, and the gap has held steady at around 13%.
  • California. When a plot is placed inside an official active fault zone, its value falls by 6.6% on average and its rent by 3.3%.
  • Tokyo. According to the official seismic hazard map, land in the riskiest zones is about 10% cheaper than in the safest ones.
  • Japan overall. Before major earthquakes, buyers barely priced in seismic risk. Afterwards, the discount in hazardous areas became noticeable and more than doubled.

What this means for a buyer

Three patterns repeat across all these markets.

  1. Prices react to visible risk. A discount appears once the risk is officially disclosed or the country has lived through a strong earthquake. Earlier risk maps of Christchurch that nobody paid attention to had no effect on prices.
  2. The building matters more than the country. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current seismic codes, on weak soils or close to a fault. In Istanbul this has shown up in bank valuations since 2023.
  3. Commercial property is penalised harder. In Wellington, commercial buildings officially classified as earthquake-prone sell for 45% less on average.

For an investor, an earthquake map is therefore not geography but part of the valuation of a property. It shows how likely a shock that changes the price is, and in which parts of the country it is more likely.

What to check before buying in a seismic country

  • The year of construction and which edition of the seismic code the building was designed to.
  • The type of soil and the distance to active faults.
  • Earthquake insurance: whether it is mandatory and what it covers.
  • For high-rises, an independent structural report, not just the developer’s documents.

Earthquakes in Mexico and the property market

The map window also covers the south-western United States and Guatemala. Between 1926 and 2026 it recorded 397 earthquakes of magnitude 6 and above, 54 of them of magnitude 7 and above. The strongest was M 8.2, on 8 September 2017, off the Isthmus of Tehuantepec.

Mexico's main lesson is the ground under a building. The Michoacán earthquake of 19 September 1985 struck more than 350 km from Mexico City, yet the capital suffered most: 412 buildings collapsed and another 3,124 were seriously damaged. The clay deposits of a former lake amplified the shaking, and buildings of 6–15 storeys fared worst. Exactly 32 years later, on 19 September 2017, the Puebla earthquake (M 7.1) hit Mexico City again: 228 of the 370 deaths were in the capital, and at least 44 buildings collapsed.

That is why in Mexico the price of risk depends not only on the city but on the ground beneath the plot, the number of storeys and the year of construction. Before buying, check which building code the structure was designed to and consult the data of the National Seismological Service (SSN). Our materials contain no data on how seismic risk is priced into housing in Mexico, so the patterns from other markets described above serve as a guide.

Questions and answers

Does seismic risk affect property prices?
Yes. Studies from Japan, California, New Zealand and Turkey show that housing in high seismic-risk zones is cheaper, and the gap widens after strong earthquakes.
How much cheaper is housing in earthquake-prone areas?
Between 2% and 18%, depending on the study. The gap is largest where the risk is officially mapped: 13–18% in Christchurch, about 10% in Tokyo and 6.6% in California.
What matters more — the country’s seismicity or the specific building?
The building. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current codes and those on weak soils or near faults.
Where does the map data come from?
The USGS ComCat earthquake catalogue: all events of magnitude 4.5 and above from 1926 to 2026, downloaded on 11 October 2026. Faults are drawn schematically from published reviews.