WhiteIndex

Earthquakes in Italy, 1926–2026

331on the map
0M ≥ 7
6.9max M
Magnitude
1926
2026
Layers
WhiteIndex

Tap a circle or a line on the map to see the details

M 6 · 6.5 · 7 · 7.5 (outlined if M ≥ 7)
M 4.5 · 5.5 (smaller events, no outline)
Subduction zone / thrust belt (teeth on the overriding side)
Strike-slip fault / transform zone
Elevations of 500, 1,000 and 2,000 m and sea depths of 200, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 m: darker means higher or deeper.
Shaking intensity zones from USGS ShakeMap (MMI scale: IV, VI, VIII). Shown when you select an event.
zones (model) — a USGS model reconstruction (ShakeMap Atlas), not measurements
Normal fault, ticks on the downthrown side
Diffuse or poorly mapped zone
Historical events before 1926 (for context)

Fault lines are schematic, drawn from published reviews without precise georeferencing. Construction decisions require the current NTC 2018 building code (DM 17 January 2018), the municipality’s seismic zone (zones 1–4 under OPCM 3274/2003 and 3519/2006), INGV data and site-specific engineering surveys.

All events of magnitude 4.5 and above in the USGS ComCat catalog within 35.3–47.2°N, 6.5–19°E, plus the main active faults.

Main faults

Strongest events (M ≥ 6), 1926–2026

DateMDepth, kmLocation (USGS)Structure
1927-02-146.021511 km NW of Bileća, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDinarides (by location)
1930-07-236.64153 km SSW of Bisaccia Nuova, ItalyApennines (by location)
1942-12-296.17152 km SE of Grabovci, CroatiaDinarides (by location)
1946-01-256.15102 km WNW of Kandersteg, SwitzerlandWestern Alps (by location)
1962-01-076.16154 km SW of Tučepi, CroatiaDinarides (by location)
1962-01-116.23154 km ENE of Baška Voda, CroatiaDinarides (by location)
1962-08-216.2203 km SW of Montecalvo Irpino, ItalyApennines (by location)
1963-07-196.31558 km SSE of San Lorenzo al Mare, ItalyLigurian Sea (by location)
1963-07-196.11562 km SSE of San Lorenzo al Mare, ItalyLigurian Sea (by location)
1968-01-156.08103 km NE of Montevago, ItalySicily and southern Tyrrhenian (by location)
1969-10-266.1155 km WSW of Jezero, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDinarides (by location)
1969-10-276.1104 km ENE of Trn, Bosnia and HerzegovinaDinarides (by location)
1976-05-066.593 km SW of Prato, ItalyTranspressive faults of the Southern Alps, Friuli
1976-06-176.1241 km WNW of Lestans, ItalySouthern Alps thrusts, Friuli (by location)
1976-09-156105 km NNE of Isola, ItalySouthern Alps thrusts, Friuli (by location)
1979-05-246.288 km WSW of Budva, MontenegroDinarides (by location)
1980-11-236.9102 km N of Cairano, ItalyIrpinia normal fault, surface rupture about 40 km
1996-09-056109 km ESE of Podgora, CroatiaDinarides (by location)
1997-09-266103 km SSE of Nocera Umbra, ItalyApennines (by location)
2002-09-066534 km NNE of Santa Flavia, ItalySicily and southern Tyrrhenian (by location)
2009-04-066.38.83 km SE of Sassa, ItalyPaganica normal fault, Apennines
2012-05-2066.34 km NNE of Massa Finalese, ItalyBlind thrusts beneath the Po Plain
2016-08-246.24.45 km WNW of Accumoli, ItalyApennines (by location)
2016-10-266.1102 km NNW of Visso, ItalyApennines (by location)
2016-10-306.685 km ESE of Preci, ItalyMt Vettore – Mt Bove normal fault, Apennines
2020-12-296.4102 km WSW of Petrinja, CroatiaDinarides (by location)
2026-03-09637516 km SSE of Sant'Angelo, ItalySubducting Ionian slab, deep earthquake (by location)
2026-06-016.224323 km WSW of San Lucido, ItalySubducting Ionian slab, deep earthquake (by location)

Structure attribution is an interpretation based on epicentre location and the literature. Stated directly by sources: 1976, transpressive faults of the Southern Alps; 1980, Irpinia normal fault; 2009, Paganica fault; 2012, blind thrusts beneath the Po Plain; 30 October 2016, Vettore–Bove fault. Click a row to show the event on the map.

USGS data as of 14 October 2026

Sources and method

Catalog. USGS ComCat, FDSN event web service: M ≥ 4.5, 1926-01-01 to 2026-10-14, 35.3–47.2°N, 6.5–19°E. 922 events in total: 28 of M ≥ 6, 303 of M 5–5.9 and 591 of M 4.5–4.9. Downloaded on 2026-10-14 directly from the USGS server and verified with checksums. Events of M ≥ 5.5 are given at full precision with the USGS place name (lost letters restored in three names: Bileća, Tučepi, Kočerin); for the rest, coordinates are rounded to 0.01° and magnitude to 0.1, and place names were not kept. Italy’s national catalog is INGV’s CPTI15; its magnitudes may differ from USGS. Any event can be checked in the USGS search.

Strongest earthquakes. 1980 Irpinia earthquake; ISPRA: Irpinia 1980; 1930 Irpinia earthquake; 1968 Belice earthquake; 1976 Friuli earthquake; 1997 Umbria and Marche earthquake; 2002 Molise earthquake; 2009 L'Aquila earthquake; 2012 Northern Italy earthquakes; August 2016 Central Italy earthquake; October 2016 Central Italy earthquakes; INGV CPTI15 / ASMI; Geopop (INGV): Campi Flegrei, 31.07.2026.

Apennines, Calabrian Arc, Sicily, Po Plain, Friuli. Mantenuto, D’Agostino et al. 2007: Apennine extension; Civico et al. 2018: Vettore–Bove rupture; Vittori et al. 2011: Paganica fault; Pantosti et al. 1993: Irpinia fault; Neri et al. 2020: Calabrian Arc; Pirrotta & Barbano 2020: Malta Escarpment; Il Post / INGV: Emilia 2012; Patricelli et al. 2022: Friuli 1976.

Codes and monitoring. NTC 2018 (DM 17.01.2018); OPCM 3274/2003; Protezione Civile: seismic classification; INGV.

Historical events. 1693 Sicily earthquake; 1783 Calabrian earthquakes; 1908 Messina earthquake; 1915 Avezzano earthquake.

Terrain and depths. AWS Terrain Tiles (Terrarium format, Mapzen; combines SRTM, GMTED2010, ETOPO1 and other datasets), zoom 6 (about 2 km). The data are smoothed and generalised to contours of 500, 1,000 and 2,000 m and depths of 200, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 m; areas smaller than about 700 km² are not shown, so Alpine areas above 3,000 m have no band of their own.

Intensity zones and impacts. USGS ShakeMap: 1930 (iscgem907513, Atlas v4), 1968 (iscgem827285, Atlas v4), 1976 (usp0000g5v, Atlas v4), 1980 (usp0001ay4, Atlas v4), 2009 (usp000gvtu, Atlas v4), 2012 (usp000jkn8, Atlas v4), 2016-08 (us10006g7d, Atlas v4), 2016-10 (us1000731j, Atlas v4); MMI IV, VI and VIII contours simplified to about 1.5 km. These are ShakeMap Atlas model estimates based on the data available at the time; for the 1997 and 2002 earthquakes only the impacts are shown. Losses: 1930 Irpinia; 1968 Belice; 1976 Friuli; 1980 Irpinia; 1997 Umbria–Marche; 2002 Molise; 2009 L'Aquila; 2012 Emilia; August 2016; October 2016.

Coastlines and borders. Natural Earth 1:10m (world-atlas 2.0.2 package), simplified to about 0.8 km; islands smaller than about 25 km² are not shown. San Marino is shown as a separate state; Vatican City is too small for this scale.

Sources for the text

How earthquakes affect property prices

Seismic risk is one of the few factors that lowers property values for a long time and in a measurable way. This is not a forecast but a finding from markets where the risk has been officially mapped and prices can be tracked for years.

  • New Zealand. After the 2010–2011 earthquakes, land in Christchurch was classified by liquefaction risk. By the third year, homes in the highest-risk category had lost 17.7% of their value relative to neighbouring land, and the gap has held steady at around 13%.
  • California. When a plot is placed inside an official active fault zone, its value falls by 6.6% on average and its rent by 3.3%.
  • Tokyo. According to the official seismic hazard map, land in the riskiest zones is about 10% cheaper than in the safest ones.
  • Japan overall. Before major earthquakes, buyers barely priced in seismic risk. Afterwards, the discount in hazardous areas became noticeable and more than doubled.

What this means for a buyer

Three patterns repeat across all these markets.

  1. Prices react to visible risk. A discount appears once the risk is officially disclosed or the country has lived through a strong earthquake. Earlier risk maps of Christchurch that nobody paid attention to had no effect on prices.
  2. The building matters more than the country. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current seismic codes, on weak soils or close to a fault. In Istanbul this has shown up in bank valuations since 2023.
  3. Commercial property is penalised harder. In Wellington, commercial buildings officially classified as earthquake-prone sell for 45% less on average.

For an investor, an earthquake map is therefore not geography but part of the valuation of a property. It shows how likely a shock that changes the price is, and in which parts of the country it is more likely.

What to check before buying in a seismic country

  • The year of construction and which edition of the seismic code the building was designed to.
  • The type of soil and the distance to active faults.
  • Earthquake insurance: whether it is mandatory and what it covers.
  • For high-rises, an independent structural report, not just the developer’s documents.

Earthquakes in Italy and the property market

The map window covers all of Italy, including Sicily and Sardinia, as well as neighbouring parts of the Alps, the Balkans and North Africa. Between 1926 and 2026 it recorded 28 earthquakes of magnitude 6 and above and none of magnitude 7 or above. The strongest was M 6.9, on 23 November 1980, in Irpinia.

In Italy even moderate earthquakes can be devastating. In L'Aquila in 2009 (M 6.3 according to USGS), 308 people died, more than 66,000 were left homeless, and the damage came to about 16 billion dollars. The 2012 Emilia earthquakes left up to 45,000 people without homes, with damage of about 13 billion euros. After the 1968 Belice Valley earthquake, about 60,000 people were still living in temporary housing 9 years later.

Every comune has a seismic zone, from 1 to 4 under OPCM 3274/2003 and 3519/2006, and new buildings are designed to the NTC 2018 standards. Before buying, find out the zone of the comune and check which standards the building was designed to. Our materials contain no data on how seismic risk is priced into housing in Italy, so the patterns from other markets described above serve as a guide.

Questions and answers

Does seismic risk affect property prices?
Yes. Studies from Japan, California, New Zealand and Turkey show that housing in high seismic-risk zones is cheaper, and the gap widens after strong earthquakes.
How much cheaper is housing in earthquake-prone areas?
Between 2% and 18%, depending on the study. The gap is largest where the risk is officially mapped: 13–18% in Christchurch, about 10% in Tokyo and 6.6% in California.
What matters more — the country’s seismicity or the specific building?
The building. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current codes and those on weak soils or near faults.
Where does the map data come from?
The USGS ComCat earthquake catalogue: all events of magnitude 4.5 and above from 1926 to 2026, downloaded on 14 October 2026. Faults are drawn schematically from published reviews.