WhiteIndex

Earthquakes in Israel, 1926–2026

73on the map
1M ≥ 7
7.2max M
Magnitude
1926
2026
Layers
WhiteIndex

Tap a circle or a line on the map to see the details

M 6 · 6.5 · 7 · 7.5 (outlined if M ≥ 7)
M 4.5 · 5.5 (smaller events, no outline)
Strike-slip fault / transform zone
Elevations of 500, 1,000 and 2,000 m and sea depths of 200, 1,000 and 2,000 m: darker means higher or deeper. The Dead Sea depression (below −200 m) is shaded as depth.
Shaking intensity zones from USGS ShakeMap (MMI scale: IV, VI, VIII). Shown when you select an event.
zones (model) — a USGS model reconstruction (ShakeMap Atlas), not measurements
Diffuse or poorly mapped zone
Historical events before 1926 (for context)

Fault lines are schematic, drawn from published reviews without precise georeferencing. Construction decisions require Israeli Standard SI 413, Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance (1995, amended 2023), data from the Israeli Seismic Network of the Geological Survey of Israel and site-specific engineering surveys.

All events of magnitude 4.5 and above in the USGS ComCat catalog within 28.5–34°N, 33–37°E, plus the main active faults.

Main faults

Strongest events (M ≥ 5.5), 1926–2026

DateMDepth, kmLocation (USGS)Structure
1927-07-116.1315Dead Sea regionDead Sea Transform (by location)
1951-01-305.8815127 km WNW of Jaffa, IsraelEastern Mediterranean, offshore (by location)
1956-03-165.51511 km WSW of Aanjar, LebanonRoum Fault (paleoseismic studies)
1956-12-185.671527 km SE of Za‘tarah, Palestinian TerritoryDead Sea Transform (by location)
1993-08-036.11027 km NNE of Dahab, EgyptAragonese Deep, Gulf of Aqaba (by location)
1993-08-035.71029 km S of Nuwaybi‘a, EgyptDead Sea Transform (by location)
1995-11-227.21027 km SSE of Nuwaybi‘a, EgyptGulf of Aqaba faults, Dead Sea Transform
1995-11-235.71023 km WSW of Tala Bay, JordanDead Sea Transform (by location)
2015-06-275.5220 km SSE of Nuwaybi‘a, EgyptDead Sea Transform (by location)

Structure attribution is an interpretation based on epicentre location and the literature. Stated directly by sources: 16 March 1956, Roum Fault (paleoseismic studies); 22 November 1995, Gulf of Aqaba faults. Click a row to show the event on the map.

USGS data as of 13 October 2026

Country analytical review →

Sources and method

Catalog. USGS ComCat, FDSN event web service: M ≥ 4.5, 1926-01-01 to 2026-10-13, 28.5–34°N, 33–37°E. 73 events in total: 3 of M ≥ 6, 23 of M 5–5.9 and 47 of M 4.5–4.9. Downloaded on 2026-10-13 directly from the USGS server and verified with a checksum. Coordinates and magnitudes are not rounded; place names are as given by USGS, except that in four names lost diacritic letters were replaced with plain Latin ones (Mitzpe Yeriho, Jayrud, Al Karamah, Al Fasayil). Any event can be checked in the USGS search.

Strongest earthquakes. 1927 Jericho earthquake; 1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake; 1956 Chim earthquake.

Dead Sea Transform, Gulf of Aqaba, Hula basin, faults of Lebanon. Dead Sea Transform; Gulf of Aqaba; Hula basin; Geology of Lebanon.

Codes and monitoring. Standards Institution of Israel, SI 413; Nof, Lior, Kurzon (2021), Frontiers in Earth Science: Israeli Seismic Network.

Historical events. 749 Galilee earthquake; Galilee earthquake of 1837.

Terrain and depths. AWS Terrain Tiles (Terrarium format, Mapzen; combines SRTM, GMTED2010, ETOPO1 and other datasets), zoom 8 (about 0.5 km). The data are smoothed and generalised to contours of 500, 1,000 and 2,000 m and depths of 200, 1,000 and 2,000 m; areas smaller than about 100 km² are not shown. The −200 m level also covers land below sea level: the Dead Sea depression and the Jordan Valley.

Intensity zones and impacts. USGS ShakeMap: 1927 (iscgem909378, Atlas v4), 1956 (iscgem888080, Atlas v4), 1995 (usp0007788, Atlas v4); MMI IV, VI and VIII contours simplified to about 1 km. These are ShakeMap Atlas model estimates based on the data available at the time. Losses: 1927 Jericho earthquake; 1956 Chim earthquake; 1995 Gulf of Aqaba earthquake.

Coastlines and borders. Natural Earth 1:10m (world-atlas 2.0.2 package), simplified to about 0.4 km; islands smaller than about 2 km² are not shown. Borders are Natural Earth de facto lines: the Israel polygon includes the Golan Heights, and Palestine (the West Bank and Gaza) is a separate polygon. The map takes no position on questions of territorial status.

Sources for the text

How earthquakes affect property prices

Seismic risk is one of the few factors that lowers property values for a long time and in a measurable way. This is not a forecast but a finding from markets where the risk has been officially mapped and prices can be tracked for years.

  • New Zealand. After the 2010–2011 earthquakes, land in Christchurch was classified by liquefaction risk. By the third year, homes in the highest-risk category had lost 17.7% of their value relative to neighbouring land, and the gap has held steady at around 13%.
  • California. When a plot is placed inside an official active fault zone, its value falls by 6.6% on average and its rent by 3.3%.
  • Tokyo. According to the official seismic hazard map, land in the riskiest zones is about 10% cheaper than in the safest ones.
  • Japan overall. Before major earthquakes, buyers barely priced in seismic risk. Afterwards, the discount in hazardous areas became noticeable and more than doubled.

What this means for a buyer

Three patterns repeat across all these markets.

  1. Prices react to visible risk. A discount appears once the risk is officially disclosed or the country has lived through a strong earthquake. Earlier risk maps of Christchurch that nobody paid attention to had no effect on prices.
  2. The building matters more than the country. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current seismic codes, on weak soils or close to a fault. In Istanbul this has shown up in bank valuations since 2023.
  3. Commercial property is penalised harder. In Wellington, commercial buildings officially classified as earthquake-prone sell for 45% less on average.

For an investor, an earthquake map is therefore not geography but part of the valuation of a property. It shows how likely a shock that changes the price is, and in which parts of the country it is more likely.

What to check before buying in a seismic country

  • The year of construction and which edition of the seismic code the building was designed to.
  • The type of soil and the distance to active faults.
  • Earthquake insurance: whether it is mandatory and what it covers.
  • For high-rises, an independent structural report, not just the developer’s documents.

Earthquakes in Israel and the property market

The map window also covers the Palestinian territories, Lebanon, south-western Syria, western Jordan, Sinai and the Gulf of Aqaba. Almost all seismicity here is linked to the Dead Sea Transform, the boundary between the African and Arabian plates. Between 1926 and 2026 the window recorded 3 earthquakes of magnitude 6 and above, one of them of magnitude 7 and above. The strongest was M 7.2, on 22 November 1995, in the Gulf of Aqaba.

Strong earthquakes are rare here, but destructive. The Jericho earthquake of 11 July 1927 (M 6.13 according to USGS) killed between 285 and 500 people; in Jerusalem about 300 houses collapsed or were badly damaged. In 1995, 7 hotels and 50 buildings were damaged in Eilat, and soil liquefaction was observed. The historical earthquakes of 749 and 1837 destroyed towns in Galilee, including Tiberias.

Because strong shocks are rare, the market barely notices the risk, and experience elsewhere shows that a price discount appears precisely after a strong earthquake. Before buying, check whether the building was designed to standard SI 413, "Design provisions for earthquake resistance of structures" (1995, amended in 2023), and take into account proximity to the Jordan Valley and Arava faults. Our materials contain no data on how seismic risk is priced into housing in Israel, so the patterns from other markets described above serve as a guide.

Questions and answers

Does seismic risk affect property prices?
Yes. Studies from Japan, California, New Zealand and Turkey show that housing in high seismic-risk zones is cheaper, and the gap widens after strong earthquakes.
How much cheaper is housing in earthquake-prone areas?
Between 2% and 18%, depending on the study. The gap is largest where the risk is officially mapped: 13–18% in Christchurch, about 10% in Tokyo and 6.6% in California.
What matters more — the country’s seismicity or the specific building?
The building. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current codes and those on weak soils or near faults.
Where does the map data come from?
The USGS ComCat earthquake catalogue: all events of magnitude 4.5 and above from 1926 to 2026, downloaded on 13 October 2026. Faults are drawn schematically from published reviews.