WhiteIndex

Earthquakes in Indonesia, 1926–2026

1432on the map
159M ≥ 7
9.1max M
Magnitude
1926
2026
Layers
WhiteIndex

Tap a circle or a line on the map to see the details

M 6 · 6.5 · 7 · 7.5 (outlined if M ≥ 7)
M 5 · 5.5 (smaller events, no outline)
Subduction zone / thrust belt (teeth on the overriding side)
Strike-slip fault / transform zone
Elevations of 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 m and sea depths of 200, 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 m: darker means higher or deeper.
Shaking intensity zones from USGS ShakeMap (MMI scale: IV, VI, VIII). Shown when you select an event.
zones (model) — a USGS model reconstruction (ShakeMap Atlas), not measurements
Diffuse or poorly mapped zone
Historical events before 1926 (for context)

Fault lines are schematic, drawn from published reviews without precise georeferencing. Construction decisions require Indonesia’s current building codes, data from the Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysical Agency (BMKG) and site-specific engineering surveys.

All events of magnitude 5 and above in the USGS ComCat catalog within 11.5°S–6.5°N, 94–141.5°E, plus the main active faults.

Main faults

Strongest events (M ≥ 8), 1926–2026

DateMDepth, kmLocation (USGS)Structure
1938-02-018.5251938 Banda Sea EarthquakeIntraslab earthquake, Banda Sea
1939-12-218.11501939 Sulawesi EarthquakeSubduction zone (by location)
1963-11-048.11101963 Banda Sea EarthquakeSubduction zone (by location)
1965-01-248.228.31965 Ceram Sea EarthquakeSubduction zone (by location)
1972-12-02851.31972 Mindanao, Philippines EarthquakeSubduction zone (by location)
1977-08-198.315.91977 Sumba, Indonesia EarthquakeOuter-rise normal faulting (Sumba)
1996-02-178.09331996 Biak, Indonesia EarthquakeNew Guinea Trench megathrust (Biak)
2004-12-269.1302004 Sumatra - Andaman Islands EarthquakeSunda megathrust
2005-03-288.63078 km WSW of Singkil, IndonesiaSunda megathrust (adjacent segment)
2007-09-128.434122 km SW of Bengkulu, IndonesiaSunda megathrust (Bengkulu)

Structure attribution is an interpretation based on epicentre location and the literature. Stated directly by sources: 2004, 2005 and 2007, Sunda megathrust; 1938, intraslab earthquake in the Banda Sea; 1977, outer-rise normal faulting; 1996, New Guinea Trench megathrust. Click a row to show the event on the map.

USGS data as of 11 October 2026

Country analytical review →

Sources and method

Catalog. USGS ComCat, FDSN event web service: M ≥ 5, 1926-01-01 to 2026-10-11, 11.5°S–6.5°N, 94–141.5°E. 14,589 events in total: 1,432 of M ≥ 6 and 13,157 of M 5–5.9. Events of M 4.5–4.9 are not included: the window holds about 29,000 of them (43,744 of M ≥ 4.5 in all), which would make the page too heavy. Downloaded on 2026-10-11 directly from the USGS server and verified with checksums. For events below M 6, coordinates are rounded to 0.01° and magnitude to 0.1 (values of 5.95–5.99 are shown as 5.9); place names were not kept. Any event can be checked in the USGS search.

Strongest earthquakes. 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami; 2005 Nias–Simeulue earthquake; 2007 Bengkulu earthquakes; 1938 Banda Sea earthquake; 1977 Sumba earthquake; 1996 Biak earthquake.

Sunda megathrust and trench, Sumatran fault, Flores, Banda Arc. Sunda megathrust; Sunda Trench; Great Sumatran fault; Flores back-arc thrust fault; Banda Arc; Timor Trough.

Eastern Indonesia. Palu-Koro Fault; Molucca Sea Collision Zone; Sorong Fault; 1992 Flores earthquake and tsunami; 5 August 2018 Lombok earthquake.

Historical events. 1833 Sumatra earthquake; 1861 Sumatra earthquake.

Terrain and depths. AWS Terrain Tiles (Terrarium format, Mapzen; combines SRTM, GMTED2010, ETOPO1 and other datasets), zoom 6 (about 2.4 km). The data are smoothed and generalised to contours of 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 m and depths of 200, 1,000, 3,000 and 5,000 m; areas smaller than about 900 km² are not shown.

Intensity zones and impacts. USGS ShakeMap: 2004 (official20041226005853450_30, Atlas v4), 2006 (usp000ej1c, Atlas v4), 2009 (usp000h237, Atlas v4), 2018, Lombok (us1000g3ub, Atlas v4), 2018, Palu (us1000h3p4, Atlas v4); MMI IV, VI and VIII contours simplified to about 1 km (about 3 km for 2004); a missing contour means the model does not reach that intensity. These are ShakeMap Atlas model estimates based on the data available at the time. Losses: 2004 Indian Ocean earthquake and tsunami; 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake; 2009 Sumatra earthquakes; 5 August 2018 Lombok earthquake; 2018 Sulawesi earthquake and tsunami.

Coastlines. Natural Earth 1:10m (world-atlas 2.0.2 package), simplified to about 1 km; islands smaller than about 18 km² are not shown.

Sources for the text

How earthquakes affect property prices

Seismic risk is one of the few factors that lowers property values for a long time and in a measurable way. This is not a forecast but a finding from markets where the risk has been officially mapped and prices can be tracked for years.

  • New Zealand. After the 2010–2011 earthquakes, land in Christchurch was classified by liquefaction risk. By the third year, homes in the highest-risk category had lost 17.7% of their value relative to neighbouring land, and the gap has held steady at around 13%.
  • California. When a plot is placed inside an official active fault zone, its value falls by 6.6% on average and its rent by 3.3%.
  • Tokyo. According to the official seismic hazard map, land in the riskiest zones is about 10% cheaper than in the safest ones.
  • Japan overall. Before major earthquakes, buyers barely priced in seismic risk. Afterwards, the discount in hazardous areas became noticeable and more than doubled.

What this means for a buyer

Three patterns repeat across all these markets.

  1. Prices react to visible risk. A discount appears once the risk is officially disclosed or the country has lived through a strong earthquake. Earlier risk maps of Christchurch that nobody paid attention to had no effect on prices.
  2. The building matters more than the country. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current seismic codes, on weak soils or close to a fault. In Istanbul this has shown up in bank valuations since 2023.
  3. Commercial property is penalised harder. In Wellington, commercial buildings officially classified as earthquake-prone sell for 45% less on average.

For an investor, an earthquake map is therefore not geography but part of the valuation of a property. It shows how likely a shock that changes the price is, and in which parts of the country it is more likely.

What to check before buying in a seismic country

  • The year of construction and which edition of the seismic code the building was designed to.
  • The type of soil and the distance to active faults.
  • Earthquake insurance: whether it is mandatory and what it covers.
  • For high-rises, an independent structural report, not just the developer’s documents.

Earthquakes in Indonesia and the property market

The map window covers all of Indonesia plus Malaysia, Timor-Leste, the southern Philippines and western New Guinea. The catalogue threshold here is M 5 rather than 4.5, because the window holds too many weaker events. Between 1926 and 2026 it recorded 1,432 earthquakes of magnitude 6 and above, 159 of them of magnitude 7 and above. The strongest was M 9.1, on 26 December 2004, off Sumatra.

For property in Indonesia, the danger lies not only in the shaking but in what it triggers. The 2004 tsunami reached run-up heights of 15–30 m, and more than 500,000 people in Indonesia lost their homes. In Palu in 2018, soil liquefaction displaced about 180 ha in Petobo and 47.8 ha in Balaroa. The 2006 Yogyakarta earthquake (M 6.3) destroyed about 154,000 houses and damaged another 260,000.

For a buyer, this means that the plot's location and soil matter more than an island's average seismicity. Before buying, check how far the property is from the shore, what ground it stands on and which building code the structure was designed to, and consult the data of the Meteorology, Climatology and Geophysics Agency (BMKG). Our materials contain no data on how seismic risk is priced into housing in Indonesia, so the patterns from other markets described above serve as a guide.

Questions and answers

Does seismic risk affect property prices?
Yes. Studies from Japan, California, New Zealand and Turkey show that housing in high seismic-risk zones is cheaper, and the gap widens after strong earthquakes.
How much cheaper is housing in earthquake-prone areas?
Between 2% and 18%, depending on the study. The gap is largest where the risk is officially mapped: 13–18% in Christchurch, about 10% in Tokyo and 6.6% in California.
What matters more — the country’s seismicity or the specific building?
The building. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current codes and those on weak soils or near faults.
Where does the map data come from?
The USGS ComCat earthquake catalogue: all events of magnitude 5 and above from 1926 to 2026, downloaded on 11 October 2026. Faults are drawn schematically from published reviews.