WhiteIndex

Earthquakes in Georgia, 1926–2026

13on the map
1M ≥ 7
7max M
Magnitude
1926
2026
Layers
WhiteIndex

Tap a circle or a line on the map to see the details

M 6 · 6.5 · 7 · 7.5 (outlined if M ≥ 7)
M 4.5 · 5.5 (smaller events, no outline)
Thrust / thrust belt (teeth on the hanging wall)
Strike-slip fault / transform zone
Elevations of 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 m and sea depths of 200, 1,000 and 2,000 m: darker means higher or deeper.
Shaking intensity zones from USGS ShakeMap (MMI scale: IV, VI, VIII). Shown when you select an event.
zones (model) — a USGS model reconstruction (ShakeMap Atlas), not measurements
Diffuse or poorly mapped zone
Historical events before 1926 (for context)

Fault lines are schematic, drawn from published reviews without precise georeferencing. Construction decisions require Georgia’s current seismic zoning code, active fault maps and site-specific engineering surveys.

All events of magnitude 4.5 and above in the USGS ComCat catalog within 40–44.3°N, 39.3–47.7°E, plus the region’s main active faults.

Main faults

Strongest events (M ≥ 6.5), 1926–2026

DateMDepth, kmLocation (USGS)Structure
1970-05-146.712.25 km ENE of Uchkent, RussiaNorthern slope of the Greater Caucasus, Dagestan (by location)
1983-10-306.811.627 km E of Narman, TurkeyLeft-lateral strike-slip (focal mechanism)
1988-12-076.85.410 km N of Gogaran, ArmeniaPambak–Sevan belt (Spitak)
1991-04-29717.222 km WNW of Java, GeorgiaGreater Caucasus thrust front (Racha)

Structure attribution is an interpretation based on epicentre location and the literature. Stated directly by sources: 1991 (Racha), the active thrust front on the southern margin of the Greater Caucasus; 1988 (Spitak), the western segment of the Pambak–Sevan fold-and-thrust belt. Click a row to show the event on the map.

USGS data as of 11 October 2026

Country analytical review →

Sources and method

Catalog. USGS ComCat, FDSN event web service: M ≥ 4.5, 1926-01-01 to 2026-10-11, 40–44.3°N, 39.3–47.7°E. 368 events in total: 13 of M ≥ 6, 120 of M 5–5.9 and 235 of M 4.5–4.9; 7 of the M ≥ 6 events lie within Georgia’s internationally recognised borders. Downloaded on 2026-10-11 directly from the USGS server and verified with a checksum. For events below M 6, coordinates are rounded to 0.01°; place names were not kept. Any event can be checked in the USGS search.

Racha, 1991. Wikipedia: 1991 Racha earthquake.

Spitak, 1988, and the Pambak–Sevan–Syunik fault. Wikipedia: 1988 Armenian earthquake; EARTH Magazine; Karakhanyan et al., Tectonophysics, 2013.

Greater Caucasus thrusts, Gagra–Java, Tskhinvali–Kazbegi, Adjara–Trialeti. Oxford Research Archive; NHESS Discussions, 2016; EGU 2006.

Gori 1920, Samtskhe 1283, Tbilisi 2002. 1920 Gori earthquake; 1283 Samtskhe earthquake; 2002 Tbilisi earthquake.

Dagestan 1970, Erzurum 1983. 1970 Dagestan earthquake; 1983 Erzurum earthquake.

Terrain and depths. AWS Terrain Tiles (Terrarium format, Mapzen; combines SRTM, GMTED2010, ETOPO1 and other datasets), zoom 8 (about 0.5 km). The data are smoothed and generalised to contours of 500, 1,000, 2,000 and 3,000 m and depths of 200, 1,000 and 2,000 m; areas smaller than about 90 km² are not shown.

Intensity zones and impacts. USGS ShakeMap: 1983 (usp0001zdn, Atlas v4), 1988 (usp0003pmm, Atlas v4), 1991 (usp0004qza, Atlas v4); MMI IV, VI and VIII contours simplified to about 1 km. These are ShakeMap Atlas model estimates based on the data available at the time. Losses: 1991 Racha earthquake; 1988 Armenian earthquake; 1983 Erzurum earthquake.

Coastlines. Natural Earth 1:10m (world-atlas 2.0.2 package); lakes are not shown separately. Abkhazia and the Tskhinvali region are shown as part of Georgia.

Sources for the text

How earthquakes affect property prices

Seismic risk is one of the few factors that lowers property values for a long time and in a measurable way. This is not a forecast but a finding from markets where the risk has been officially mapped and prices can be tracked for years.

  • New Zealand. After the 2010–2011 earthquakes, land in Christchurch was classified by liquefaction risk. By the third year, homes in the highest-risk category had lost 17.7% of their value relative to neighbouring land, and the gap has held steady at around 13%.
  • California. When a plot is placed inside an official active fault zone, its value falls by 6.6% on average and its rent by 3.3%.
  • Tokyo. According to the official seismic hazard map, land in the riskiest zones is about 10% cheaper than in the safest ones.
  • Japan overall. Before major earthquakes, buyers barely priced in seismic risk. Afterwards, the discount in hazardous areas became noticeable and more than doubled.

What this means for a buyer

Three patterns repeat across all these markets.

  1. Prices react to visible risk. A discount appears once the risk is officially disclosed or the country has lived through a strong earthquake. Earlier risk maps of Christchurch that nobody paid attention to had no effect on prices.
  2. The building matters more than the country. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current seismic codes, on weak soils or close to a fault. In Istanbul this has shown up in bank valuations since 2023.
  3. Commercial property is penalised harder. In Wellington, commercial buildings officially classified as earthquake-prone sell for 45% less on average.

For an investor, an earthquake map is therefore not geography but part of the valuation of a property. It shows how likely a shock that changes the price is, and in which parts of the country it is more likely.

What to check before buying in a seismic country

  • The year of construction and which edition of the seismic code the building was designed to.
  • The type of soil and the distance to active faults.
  • Earthquake insurance: whether it is mandatory and what it covers.
  • For high-rises, an independent structural report, not just the developer’s documents.

Earthquakes in Georgia and the property market

The map window also covers the North Caucasus, Armenia, western Azerbaijan and north-eastern Turkey. Between 1926 and 2026 it recorded 13 earthquakes of magnitude 6 and above, 7 of them within Georgia. The strongest was the Racha earthquake of 29 April 1991, M 7.0.

The Racha earthquake showed what seismic risk means for the housing stock: 270 people died, about 100,000 lost their homes, and 46,000 houses were destroyed in 700 settlements. The 1988 Spitak earthquake in neighbouring Armenia was worse: in Leninakan (Gyumri), 62% of tall frame-and-masonry buildings were destroyed. Even a moderate shock near Tbilisi on 25 April 2002 (mb 4.8) claimed 5–7 lives.

For a buyer, this means that in Georgia the structure and the year of construction matter most. Before buying, check which seismic zoning standards the building was designed to and whether an active fault runs nearby: the Kura fold-and-thrust belt extends east from the Tbilisi area. Our materials contain no data on how seismic risk is priced into housing in Georgia specifically, so the patterns from other markets described above serve as a guide.

Questions and answers

Does seismic risk affect property prices?
Yes. Studies from Japan, California, New Zealand and Turkey show that housing in high seismic-risk zones is cheaper, and the gap widens after strong earthquakes.
How much cheaper is housing in earthquake-prone areas?
Between 2% and 18%, depending on the study. The gap is largest where the risk is officially mapped: 13–18% in Christchurch, about 10% in Tokyo and 6.6% in California.
What matters more — the country’s seismicity or the specific building?
The building. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current codes and those on weak soils or near faults.
Where does the map data come from?
The USGS ComCat earthquake catalogue: all events of magnitude 4.5 and above from 1926 to 2026, downloaded on 11 October 2026. Faults are drawn schematically from published reviews.