WhiteIndex

Earthquakes in Costa Rica, 1926–2026

112on the map
12M ≥ 7
7.6max M
Magnitude
1926
2026
Layers
WhiteIndex

Tap a circle or a line on the map to see the details

M 6 · 6.5 · 7 · 7.5 (outlined if M ≥ 7)
M 4.5 · 5.5 (smaller events, no outline)
Subduction zone / thrust belt (teeth on the overriding side)
Strike-slip fault / transform zone
Diffuse or poorly mapped zone
Shaking intensity zones from USGS ShakeMap (MMI scale: IV, VI, VIII). Shown when you select an event.
zones (model) — a USGS model reconstruction (ShakeMap Atlas), not measurements
Historical events before 1926 (for context)

Fault lines are schematic, drawn from published reviews without precise georeferencing. Construction decisions require maps from the National Seismological Network (RSN, University of Costa Rica), OVSICORI-UNA and site-specific engineering surveys.

All events of magnitude 4.5 and above in the USGS ComCat catalog within 7.5–11.8°N, 82.3–87°W, plus the region’s main active faults.

Main faults

Strongest events (M ≥ 7), 1926–2026

DateMDepth, kmLocation (USGS)Structure
1934-07-187.53044 km ESE of Burica, PanamaPanama Fracture Zone / trench (Puerto Armuelles sequence)
1939-12-217.59254 km WNW of Atenas, Costa RicaCentral Costa Rica Deformed Belt (by location)
1941-12-057.472070 km WSW of Golfito, Costa RicaTrench off the Osa Peninsula (by location)
1950-10-057.597.9Costa RicaTrench, Nicoya segment
1956-10-247.13512 km SSW of Masachapa, NicaraguaTrench off Nicaragua (by location)
1962-07-267.182559 km SSE of Burica, PanamaPanama Fracture Zone (by location)
1978-08-2375619 km N of Nandayure, Costa RicaTrench, Nicoya segment (by location)
1983-04-037.13712 km N of Golfito, Costa RicaNear the trench / Fila Costeña (by location)
1990-03-257.322.27 km SSE of Puntarenas, Costa RicaTrench, Gulf of Nicoya (by location)
1991-04-227.61034 km S of Limón, Costa RicaNorth Panama Deformed Belt, reverse faulting (by location and mechanism)
2004-10-0973543 km SSW of Masachapa, NicaraguaTrench off Nicaragua (by location)
2012-09-057.63511 km ENE of Hojancha, Costa RicaTrench, Nicoya segment (plate-interface thrust)

Structure attribution is an interpretation based on epicentre location and the literature. Stated directly by sources: 2012 and 1950 (Nicoya segment), 1934 (Panama Fracture Zone). Click a row to show the event on the map.

USGS data as of 11 October 2026

Country analytical review →

Sources and method

Catalog. USGS ComCat, FDSN event web service: M ≥ 4.5, 1926-01-01 to 2026-10-11, 7.5–11.8°N, 82.3–87°W. 1,659 events in total: 112 of M ≥ 6, 435 of M 5–5.9 and 1,112 of M 4.5–4.9. Downloaded on 2026-10-11 directly from the USGS server and verified with checksums. For events below M 6, coordinates are rounded to 0.01° and magnitude to 0.1; place names were not kept. Any event can be checked in the USGS search.

Nicoya, 2012 and 1950. Wikipedia: 2012 Costa Rica earthquake.

Limón, 1991. Wikipedia: 1991 Limon earthquake.

Cartago, 1910, and the Aguacaliente Fault. “The Aguacaliente Fault, source of the Cartago 1910 destructive earthquake”: eprints.ucm.es; death toll: Teletica.

Cinchona, 2009. Wikipedia: 2009 Cinchona earthquake; fault and death toll per OVSICORI-UNA: elmundo.cr.

Central Costa Rica Deformed Belt. Marshall et al., 2000, Tectonics: pure.psu.edu.

Cocos Ridge, Osa, Fila Costeña. IODP, Expedition 334 Scientific Prospectus: publications.iodp.org.

Panama Fracture Zone. Jay Patton’s review: earthjay.com/?p=8499.

Coastlines. Natural Earth 1:10m (world-atlas 2.0.2 package); lakes, including Lake Nicaragua, are not shown separately.

Sources for the text

How earthquakes affect property prices

Seismic risk is one of the few factors that lowers property values for a long time and in a measurable way. This is not a forecast but a finding from markets where the risk has been officially mapped and prices can be tracked for years.

  • New Zealand. After the 2010–2011 earthquakes, land in Christchurch was classified by liquefaction risk. By the third year, homes in the highest-risk category had lost 17.7% of their value relative to neighbouring land, and the gap has held steady at around 13%.
  • California. When a plot is placed inside an official active fault zone, its value falls by 6.6% on average and its rent by 3.3%.
  • Tokyo. According to the official seismic hazard map, land in the riskiest zones is about 10% cheaper than in the safest ones.
  • Japan overall. Before major earthquakes, buyers barely priced in seismic risk. Afterwards, the discount in hazardous areas became noticeable and more than doubled.

What this means for a buyer

Three patterns repeat across all these markets.

  1. Prices react to visible risk. A discount appears once the risk is officially disclosed or the country has lived through a strong earthquake. Earlier risk maps of Christchurch that nobody paid attention to had no effect on prices.
  2. The building matters more than the country. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current seismic codes, on weak soils or close to a fault. In Istanbul this has shown up in bank valuations since 2023.
  3. Commercial property is penalised harder. In Wellington, commercial buildings officially classified as earthquake-prone sell for 45% less on average.

For an investor, an earthquake map is therefore not geography but part of the valuation of a property. It shows how likely a shock that changes the price is, and in which parts of the country it is more likely.

What to check before buying in a seismic country

  • The year of construction and which edition of the seismic code the building was designed to.
  • The type of soil and the distance to active faults.
  • Earthquake insurance: whether it is mandatory and what it covers.
  • For high-rises, an independent structural report, not just the developer’s documents.

Earthquakes in Costa Rica and the property market

Between 1926 and 2026 the map window contains 112 earthquakes of magnitude 6 or more, 12 of them of magnitude 7 or more. The strongest was M 7.6.

There are no dedicated studies of how seismic risk is reflected in Costa Rican house prices, so the patterns from other markets described above serve as a guide. According to the Global Earthquake Model, the average annual earthquake loss to the country’s housing stock is about 99 million dollars, or 0.12% of its value.

The Seismic Code of Costa Rica of 2010, as revised in 2014, is in force. A new edition with separate rules for buildings of 20 storeys and more was submitted to the government in December 2025, but as of September 2026 the decree bringing it into force had not been published. Before buying, check which edition of the code the building was designed to.

Questions and answers

Does seismic risk affect property prices?
Yes. Studies from Japan, California, New Zealand and Turkey show that housing in high seismic-risk zones is cheaper, and the gap widens after strong earthquakes.
How much cheaper is housing in earthquake-prone areas?
Between 2% and 18%, depending on the study. The gap is largest where the risk is officially mapped: 13–18% in Christchurch, about 10% in Tokyo and 6.6% in California.
What matters more — the country’s seismicity or the specific building?
The building. Within the same city, the biggest discounts hit buildings constructed before current codes and those on weak soils or near faults.
Where does the map data come from?
The USGS ComCat earthquake catalogue: all events of magnitude 4.5 and above from 1926 to 2026, downloaded on 11 October 2026. Faults are drawn schematically from published reviews.